# New 30 CAP Theorem Interview Question

## Introduction

The CAP theorem is an important concept in distributed systems that states it is impossible to simultaneously guarantee Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance. When designing a distributed system, you have to make trade-offs between these three properties. Consistency ensures that all nodes in a distributed system have the same view of data, Availability ensures that the system remains responsive even in the face of failures, and Partition tolerance allows the system to continue operating despite network failures. Interview questions about the CAP theorem often explore how candidates understand these trade-offs and how they would approach designing a distributed system that balances these properties effectively.

## Questions

### 1. What is the CAP theorem?

The CAP theorem, also known as Brewer’s theorem, states that it is impossible for a distributed computer system to simultaneously provide Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance. The theorem highlights the inherent trade-offs and constraints faced by distributed systems.

### 2. Explain the three components of the CAP theorem.

The three components of the CAP theorem are:

• Consistency: Consistency ensures that all nodes in a distributed system have the same view of data at the same time. It means that every read operation will return the most recent write or an error. Consistency guarantees that data remains valid and obeys all defined constraints.
• Availability: Availability refers to the ability of a distributed system to respond to client requests, even in the presence of failures. It means that every request receives a response, regardless of the state of the system. Availability ensures that the system remains operational and accessible to users.
• Partition tolerance: Partition tolerance is the ability of a distributed system to function even when communication between nodes is unreliable or broken. It means that the system can handle network partitions, where nodes are unable to communicate with each other. Partition tolerance allows the system to continue operating and providing services despite the presence of network failures or splits.

### 3. What does “Consistency” mean in the context of the CAP theorem?

In the context of the CAP theorem, “Consistency” refers to the requirement that all nodes in a distributed system have the same view of data at the same time. It ensures that data is synchronized and follows defined constraints and rules. Consistency guarantees that every read operation returns the most recent write or an error if the data is not available.

### 4. What does “Availability” mean in the context of the CAP theorem?

In the context of the CAP theorem, “Availability” refers to the ability of a distributed system to respond to client requests and provide services even in the presence of failures. It ensures that every request receives a response, regardless of the state of the system. Availability focuses on keeping the system operational and accessible to users.

### 5. What does “Partition tolerance” mean in the context of the CAP theorem?

In the context of the CAP theorem, “Partition tolerance” refers to the ability of a distributed system to continue operating and providing services despite the presence of network failures or splits. It ensures that the system can handle scenarios where communication between nodes is unreliable or broken. Partition tolerance enables the system to function in the presence of network partitions.

### 6. State the CAP theorem in terms of its constraints.

The CAP theorem states that in a distributed system, it is impossible to achieve all three of the following simultaneously:

• Consistency: Every read operation returns the most recent write or an error.
• Availability: Every request receives a response, regardless of the state of the system.
• Partition tolerance: The system continues to operate and provide services despite network failures or splits.

### 7. Can a distributed system satisfy all three components of the CAP theorem simultaneously?

No, according to the CAP theorem, a distributed system cannot satisfy all three components of Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance simultaneously. It must make trade-offs and prioritize two of the three components based on the specific requirements and characteristics of the system.

### 8. Explain the concept of “Eventual Consistency.”

“Eventual Consistency” is a consistency model that allows data replicas in a distributed system to diverge temporarily but guarantees that they will converge and become consistent over time. It relaxes the requirement of immediate consistency and allows for eventual synchronization of data across replicas.

Under eventual consistency, after a write operation, different replicas may have different views of the data for a certain period. However, as updates propagate and network partitions heal, the system works towards achieving a consistent state across all replicas.

Eventual consistency is often used in scenarios where high availability and partition tolerance are prioritized over strict consistency. It allows for improved performance, scalability, and fault tolerance in distributed systems.

### 9. What trade-offs does the CAP theorem impose on distributed systems?

The CAP theorem imposes trade-offs on distributed systems, requiring them to prioritize two of the three components: Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance. The trade-offs are as follows:

• Consistency vs. Availability: A system must choose whether to sacrifice immediate Consistency in favor of high Availability or sacrifice Availability to maintain strict Consistency. This trade-off depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the application.
• Consistency vs. Partition tolerance: A system must choose whether to sacrifice Consistency when dealing with network partitions to ensure Partition tolerance or sacrifice Partition tolerance to maintain strict Consistency.
• Availability vs. Partition tolerance: A system must choose whether to sacrifice Availability during network partitions to ensure Partition tolerance or sacrifice Partition tolerance to maintain high Availability.

### 10. Which two components of the CAP theorem are guaranteed during normal network operation?

During normal network operation, the two components of the CAP theorem that are guaranteed are:

• Consistency: When the network is operating normally, a distributed system can maintain strict Consistency, ensuring that all nodes have the same view of data at the same time.
• Availability: A distributed system can maintain high Availability, allowing it to respond to client requests and provide services even in the presence of failures.

Partition tolerance is the component that is not guaranteed during normal network operation. It refers to the system’s ability to continue functioning despite network failures or splits.

### 11. What happens in a distributed system when a network partition occurs?

In a distributed system, when a network partition occurs, it means that the network is divided into multiple disconnected parts, and nodes in one partition cannot communicate with nodes in other partitions. This can be caused by network failures, hardware issues, or deliberate network configuration.

During a network partition, different parts of the distributed system may have separate views of the data, and communication between nodes in different partitions is interrupted. This can lead to inconsistencies in data, as updates made in one partition may not be immediately visible to nodes in other partitions.

Network partitions pose challenges for maintaining Consistency and Availability in the CAP theorem. The system must make trade-offs between these components to handle the partition, choosing to sacrifice either Consistency or Availability to ensure Partition tolerance.

### 12. Can a distributed system choose to sacrifice “Consistency” in favor of “Availability” during a network partition?

Yes, during a network partition, a distributed system can choose to sacrifice Consistency in favor of Availability. In such cases, the system allows each partition to continue operating independently, even if it means that different partitions may have inconsistent or divergent views of the data.

By prioritizing Availability over Consistency, the system ensures that it remains accessible and responsive to client requests during the partition. However, this trade-off may result in eventual consistency issues and the need for conflict resolution when the partitions merge or communication is restored.

### 13. Can a distributed system choose to sacrifice “Availability” in favor of “Consistency” during a network partition?

Yes, during a network partition, a distributed system can choose to sacrifice Availability in favor of Consistency. In this case, the system may opt to pause or limit operations during the partition to ensure that all nodes have a consistent view of the data.

By prioritizing Consistency over Availability, the system aims to maintain a strict view of the data across all partitions, even at the cost of reduced accessibility or responsiveness. This trade-off ensures that conflicting updates or inconsistent states are avoided during the partition, but it may impact the system’s availability to users.

### 14. Is it possible for a distributed system to achieve “Consistency” and “Partition tolerance” without compromising “Availability”?

According to the CAP theorem, it is not possible for a distributed system to achieve strict Consistency and Partition tolerance without compromising Availability. When a network partition occurs, the system must choose between sacrificing either Consistency or Availability to ensure Partition tolerance.

However, it is worth noting that there are scenarios and designs where a system can achieve a form of weak or eventual Consistency and still maintain high Availability and Partition tolerance. This often involves relaxed consistency models, such as eventual consistency or eventual synchronization of data across replicas, which allow temporary divergence but ensure eventual convergence towards consistency.

### 15. Give an example of a real-world scenario where “Availability” is prioritized over “Consistency.”

One example of a real-world scenario where Availability is prioritized over Consistency is in highly distributed and fault-tolerant systems that deal with user-generated content or social media updates. In these systems, ensuring high Availability and responsiveness to user requests is crucial, even if it means temporary inconsistencies or eventual convergence of data.

For example, social media platforms often allow users to post updates, comments, and likes, which need to be immediately visible to other users. Prioritizing Availability ensures that these actions can be performed and seen by others, even in the presence of network partitions or delays in propagating updates across replicas. Although the data may not be immediately consistent across all nodes, eventual consistency mechanisms are employed to reconcile and converge the data over time.

### 16. Give an example of a real-world scenario where “Consistency” is prioritized over “Availability.”

An example of a real-world scenario where Consistency is prioritized over Availability is in financial systems or transactional databases. In these systems, maintaining strict consistency and data integrity is crucial, even if it means sacrificing immediate Availability during network partitions or failures.

For instance, in banking systems, when transferring funds between accounts, it is vital to ensure that the debiting and crediting of funds occur atomically and consistently across the system. Temporary unavailability or delays in processing transactions may be acceptable as long as the system guarantees strict consistency to prevent data inconsistencies and financial discrepancies.

### 17. Give an example of a real-world scenario where “Partition tolerance” is prioritized over “Consistency” and “Availability.”

One example of a real-world scenario where Partition tolerance is prioritized over both Consistency and Availability is in large-scale distributed systems or content delivery networks (CDNs) that aim to serve content to users worldwide.

In these systems, the focus is on ensuring that content remains accessible to users regardless of network partitions or regional outages. By prioritizing Partition tolerance, the system maintains high availability and responsiveness, even if different nodes or regions have temporarily inconsistent or divergent views of the data.

For instance, in a global CDN, it may be acceptable for some nodes to serve slightly outdated versions of web pages or media files during a partition. The system ensures that users can still access content from nearby replicas or alternative nodes, even if strict consistency across the entire network is temporarily compromised.

### 18. What is the role of conflict resolution in achieving “Consistency” in distributed systems?

Conflict resolution plays a vital role in achieving Consistency in distributed systems, especially in scenarios where data diverges across replicas or partitions. When conflicts occur, conflicting updates or operations need to be resolved to ensure a coherent and consistent state.

Conflict resolution involves comparing and reconciling conflicting updates based on predefined rules or application-specific logic. It may involve techniques such as timestamp ordering, conflict-free replicated data types (CRDTs), or distributed consensus algorithms to determine the correct outcome.

By resolving conflicts, the system works towards achieving a consistent state across replicas or partitions, ensuring that all nodes eventually converge towards the same view of the data.

### 19. Explain the concept of “Read-your-writes consistency.”

“Read-your-writes consistency” is a consistency guarantee that ensures that a read operation in a distributed system will always return the most recent write performed by the same client or process. In other words, a client can observe its own writes in subsequent read operations.

This consistency model provides a strong guarantee to clients, as it ensures that any updates made by a client are immediately visible to subsequent read operations performed by the same client. It helps maintain a consistent view of data for individual clients, even in distributed systems where different replicas or partitions may have temporary divergent states.

### 20. What are the implications of the CAP theorem for data replication in distributed databases?

The CAP theorem has significant implications for data replication in distributed databases. It forces designers and operators to make trade-offs and choices based on the desired Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance properties.

• Consistency-oriented replication: In scenarios where strict Consistency is crucial, synchronous or strong consistency models may be employed, where each write operation is confirmed on multiple replicas before returning a response. However, this can impact Availability and increase latency.
• Availability-oriented replication: When high Availability is prioritized, asynchronous or eventual consistency models may be used, allowing updates to propagate to replicas in a delayed or probabilistic manner. This enables low-latency responses but may result in temporary data inconsistencies.
• Partition-tolerant replication: Replication strategies also need to consider Partition tolerance, ensuring that the system can continue operating and serving requests despite network partitions. Techniques such as quorum-based replication, conflict resolution, or decentralized consensus algorithms may be employed to maintain operations during partitions.

### 21. What is the role of distributed consensus algorithms in achieving “Consistency” and “Partition tolerance”?

Distributed consensus algorithms play a crucial role in achieving Consistency and Partition tolerance in distributed systems. These algorithms enable multiple nodes to agree on a single value or a set of decisions even in the presence of failures or network partitions.

Consensus algorithms, such as the Paxos algorithm or the Raft consensus protocol, coordinate the agreement process among distributed nodes by ensuring that a majority or a quorum of nodes must agree on the value before it is considered accepted. This allows the system to reach Consistency in terms of shared decisions or state.

Furthermore, consensus algorithms also help maintain Partition tolerance by allowing the system to continue operating and making progress even if some nodes or network partitions are temporarily unavailable. By electing leaders or coordinating the decision-making process, consensus algorithms enable distributed systems to tolerate partitions and continue functioning in a consistent manner.

### 22. What are the limitations of traditional relational databases in terms of the CAP theorem?

Traditional relational databases, while offering strong Consistency and often high Availability, face limitations in terms of the CAP theorem’s Partition tolerance requirement.

Relational databases typically rely on a single, centralized server or a primary replica for read and write operations. This architecture makes them vulnerable to network partitions or failures, as the system’s operation relies on the availability of a central node. Network partitions can lead to unavailability or delays in accessing data, violating the Partition tolerance requirement.

In scenarios where strong Partition tolerance is necessary, traditional relational databases may struggle to handle the scale, fault tolerance, and distributed nature of modern applications. Alternative approaches, such as distributed databases, NoSQL databases, or hybrid architectures, are often adopted to achieve the desired level of Partition tolerance and scalability.

### 23. How do NoSQL databases address the trade-offs imposed by the CAP theorem?

NoSQL databases address the trade-offs imposed by the CAP theorem by providing different consistency models and replication strategies that allow for flexible configurations based on the application’s requirements.

NoSQL databases often prioritize Availability and Partition tolerance over strong Consistency. They employ various consistency models, such as eventual consistency or causal consistency, which allow temporary data divergences but ensure eventual convergence and consistency.

By relaxing immediate Consistency and embracing eventual consistency, NoSQL databases offer high availability and scalability, making them suitable for distributed and highly available systems. They utilize replication strategies that distribute data across multiple nodes, allowing the system to tolerate network partitions and continue providing services.

NoSQL databases provide a broader range of options for developers to tailor the consistency, availability, and partition tolerance trade-offs according to their application’s specific needs and performance requirements.

### 24. Describe the BASE (Basically Available, Soft-state, Eventually Consistent) principle in contrast to the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties.

The BASE principle is an alternative approach to data consistency and availability, contrasting with the traditional ACID properties:

• Basically Available: The system guarantees availability, providing a response to every request, even if it means relaxing immediate Consistency. It allows temporary data divergences or inconsistencies, emphasizing high availability and responsiveness.
• Soft-state: The system allows for flexible and relaxed data states, acknowledging that data can be transiently inconsistent or undergoing eventual convergence. It avoids the rigid constraints of immediate consistency and embraces the concept of eventual consistency.
• Eventually Consistent: The system guarantees that data replicas will converge and become consistent over time. It ensures that, given enough time, all replicas will eventually reach the same consistent state, reconciling any temporary divergences.

In contrast, the ACID properties emphasize strong Consistency and reliability:

• Atomicity: Transactions are treated as atomic units, ensuring that they are executed entirely or not at all. It guarantees that changes made within a transaction are all-or-nothing.
• Consistency: The system enforces predefined consistency rules and constraints to maintain a valid state during transaction execution. It ensures that data remains consistent and follows defined integrity rules.
• Isolation: Concurrent transactions are executed in isolation, ensuring that each transaction’s intermediate states are not visible to others until they are committed. It prevents interference and maintains transaction integrity.
• Durability: Once a transaction is committed, the changes made to the data are permanent and will survive subsequent system failures. Durability ensures data persistence and recoverability.

### 25. Can the CAP theorem be extended to include additional components or trade-offs?

The CAP theorem, as originally formulated, focuses on the three components: Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance. It provides a fundamental understanding of the inherent trade-offs in distributed systems.

While the CAP theorem itself does not explicitly include additional components or trade-offs, variations and extensions have been proposed to explore different aspects or dimensions of distributed systems. These extensions consider additional factors like latency, fault tolerance, performance, or data freshness.

Some examples include the PACELC theorem, which incorporates the notion of latency as a factor, and the PACELC-P theorem, which considers performance as an additional dimension.

These extensions aim to provide a more nuanced understanding of the trade-offs and design considerations in distributed systems.

### 26. What is the relationship between the CAP theorem and system scalability?

The CAP theorem has a direct relationship with system scalability. In the context of distributed systems, scalability refers to the system’s ability to handle increasing workloads and accommodate the growth of data and users.

The CAP theorem’s trade-offs impact system scalability:

• Consistency vs. Scalability: Maintaining strong Consistency often introduces coordination and synchronization overhead, limiting scalability. Systems that prioritize Consistency may face challenges in handling high write and read loads or scaling across multiple nodes.
• Availability vs. Scalability: Sacrificing Availability, especially during network partitions, can limit scalability as it restricts the system’s ability to respond to client requests. High Availability often requires distributed replication, which can introduce complexity and scalability challenges.
• Partition tolerance and Scalability: Partition tolerance is crucial for achieving scalability in distributed systems. By tolerating network partitions and allowing independent operation of nodes, the system can scale horizontally, adding more nodes to handle increasing workloads.

### 27. How does the CAP theorem impact system design decisions in distributed systems?

The CAP theorem has a significant impact on system design decisions in distributed systems. It forces designers to make trade-offs and prioritize certain properties based on the specific requirements and constraints of the application.

The CAP theorem influences decisions related to data consistency models, replication strategies, fault tolerance mechanisms, and distributed system architectures. Designers need to carefully consider the application’s needs in terms of Consistency, Availability, and Partition tolerance to select appropriate design patterns, algorithms, and technologies.

For example, the choice between strong Consistency and high Availability affects the replication strategy, data synchronization mechanisms, and conflict resolution techniques. The decision to prioritize Partition tolerance influences the choice of distributed consensus algorithms or partition handling mechanisms.

The impact of the CAP theorem goes beyond data management and extends to system reliability, performance, fault tolerance, and scalability. System designers must navigate these trade-offs and carefully consider the implications on system behavior, user experience, and overall system design.

### 28. What strategies can be employed to mitigate the effects of network partitions in distributed systems?

Mitigating the effects of network partitions in distributed systems can be challenging, but several strategies can help minimize their impact:

• Replication and redundancy: Replicating data across multiple nodes or data centers improves fault tolerance and provides alternative data sources during partitions. By maintaining multiple copies of data, the system can continue serving requests from available replicas.
• Consistency models: Choosing appropriate consistency models, such as eventual consistency or causal consistency, allows temporary data divergence during partitions while ensuring eventual convergence and consistency.
• Conflict resolution: Implementing conflict resolution mechanisms helps resolve conflicts that arise when data diverges across replicas or during partition merges. Conflict resolution ensures a consistent state across replicas once the partition is resolved.
• Timeouts and retries: Employing timeouts and retry mechanisms for network operations can help detect and handle network partitions. Timeouts ensure that requests do not block indefinitely, and retries allow the system to recover when partitions heal.
• Quorum-based approaches: Utilizing quorum-based approaches for read and write operations helps ensure that a majority of nodes must agree on updates before considering them successful. This helps maintain consistency and avoids issues caused by partitions.
• Health monitoring and failure detection: Monitoring the health of nodes and detecting failures promptly can aid in identifying network partitions and taking appropriate actions to handle them. Automated failure detection mechanisms can trigger partition-aware strategies.

### 29. How do distributed caching systems maintain consistency in the face of network partitions?

Distributed caching systems maintain consistency in the face of network partitions through various mechanisms:

• Replication and data distribution: Distributed caching systems replicate data across multiple cache nodes or partitions to ensure fault tolerance and availability. Data is distributed and stored redundantly to handle network partitions effectively.
• Consistency models: Caching systems often employ consistency models such as eventual consistency or causal consistency to handle partitions. These models allow temporary data divergence across replicas during partitions while ensuring eventual convergence and consistency.
• Conflict resolution: In situations where data diverges across cache nodes during a partition, conflict resolution mechanisms come into play. Conflicts can be resolved using techniques like timestamp ordering, last-writer-wins policies, or application-specific resolution strategies.
• Read and write quorums: Distributed caching systems may use read and write quorums, where a certain number of nodes must participate in read or write operations to ensure consistency. Quorums help prevent inconsistencies caused by conflicting updates across partitions.
• Partition-aware strategies: Caching systems can employ partition-aware strategies to redirect requests to available cache nodes and avoid accessing nodes affected by network partitions. This helps maintain consistency by ensuring requests are served by available and consistent replicas.

### 30. How does the CAP theorem influence the design and implementation of modern cloud computing platforms?

The CAP theorem heavily influences the design and implementation of modern cloud computing platforms, which often involve distributed systems and services. The theorem shapes the architectural choices and trade-offs made in building scalable, reliable, and performant cloud platforms.

• Replication and consistency: Cloud platforms employ various replication strategies and consistency models to balance availability and consistency trade-offs. By offering different consistency levels, cloud providers cater to a wide range of application requirements.
• Partition tolerance: Cloud platforms are designed to handle network partitions effectively. They utilize distributed consensus algorithms, partition detection mechanisms, and fault tolerance strategies to ensure system availability and operation during network failures.
• Elasticity and scalability: The CAP theorem encourages cloud platforms to scale horizontally by adding more nodes to handle increasing workloads. The ability to scale out and distribute resources across multiple nodes enhances partition tolerance and improves system availability.
• Service-level agreements (SLAs): Cloud platforms often define SLAs based on the CAP theorem trade-offs. They make explicit guarantees about consistency, availability, and partition tolerance, allowing users to select appropriate service levels based on their application’s needs.
• Data replication and durability: Cloud platforms offer data replication mechanisms to ensure fault tolerance and durability. Replicating data across multiple data centers or regions helps mitigate the impact of network partitions and provides data availability.

## MCQ Questions

### 1. What does CAP theorem stand for?

A) Consistency, Availability, Partition tolerance
B) Concurrency, Accuracy, Performance
C) Compatibility, Agility, Performance
D) Consistency, Accessibility, Performance

A) 1
B) 2
C) 3
D) 4

### 3. Which property of the CAP theorem states that every read receives the most recent write or an error?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 4. Which property of the CAP theorem states that the system continues to operate despite the presence of network failures?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 5. Which property of the CAP theorem states that the system can be divided into multiple partitions and still continue to operate?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 6. Which property of the CAP theorem refers to the eventual convergence of updates in a distributed system?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 7. Which database model is typically associated with the AP (Availability and Partition tolerance) property of the CAP theorem?

A) Relational database
B) Key-value store
C) Document database
D) Graph database

### 8. Which database model is typically associated with the CP (Consistency and Partition tolerance) property of the CAP theorem?

A) Relational database
B) Key-value store
C) Document database
D) Graph database

### 9. Which database model is typically associated with the CA (Consistency and Availability) property of the CAP theorem?

A) Relational database
B) Key-value store
C) Document database
D) Graph database

### 10. Which property of the CAP theorem is most important for systems that require strong consistency?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 11. Which property of the CAP theorem is most important for systems that prioritize availability and fault tolerance?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 12. Which property of the CAP theorem is most important for systems that prioritize scalability and handling network partitions?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 13. Which property of the CAP theorem ensures that a distributed system can continue to operate even if a subset of its nodes becomes unavailable or unreachable?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 14. Which property of the CAP theorem allows for concurrent updates and enables high availability but sacrifices strong consistency?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 15. Which property of the CAP theorem guarantees that a distributed system will always provide a response to a read or write request?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 16. In the CAP theorem, which two properties can be chosen at the same time?

A) Consistency and Availability
B) Consistency and Partition tolerance
C) Availability and Partition tolerance
D) Consistency and Eventual consistency

### 17. In the CAP theorem, which two properties cannot be guaranteed simultaneously?

A) Consistency and Availability
B) Consistency and Partition tolerance
C) Availability and Partition tolerance
D) Consistency and Eventual consistency

### 18. Which property of the CAP theorem is compromised when a network partition occurs?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 19. Which property of the CAP theorem is compromised when a distributed system experiences high network latency?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 20. Which property of the CAP theorem allows for different replicas of data to be temporarily inconsistent during updates?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 21. Which property of the CAP theorem is more important for systems that prioritize fault tolerance and recovery?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 22. In the CAP theorem, which property is usually compromised in the presence of network partitions?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 23. Which property of the CAP theorem is often achieved through replication and synchronization mechanisms?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 24. In the CAP theorem, which property can be relaxed in favor of the other two properties?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 25. In the CAP theorem, which property is essential for systems that require real-time data processing and low latency?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 26. In the CAP theorem, which property is crucial for systems that prioritize fault tolerance and scalability?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 27. Which property of the CAP theorem allows for trade-offs between consistency and availability based on specific system requirements?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 28. In the CAP theorem, which property ensures that the system operates correctly even when nodes fail or messages are lost?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 29. Which property of the CAP theorem guarantees that all nodes in a distributed system see the same data at the same time?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

### 30. In the CAP theorem, which property is typically prioritized in systems that require strong data integrity and correctness?

A) Consistency
B) Availability
C) Partition tolerance
D) Eventual consistency

Check Also
Close